|
This is my
letter to Dorset County Pension Fund 11 Jan 2008:-
Nick Buckland
Investment Manager
Corporate Resources Directorate
County Hall, Colliton Park
Dorchester
Dorset DT1 1XJ
Dear Mr Buckland
Dorset County
Pension Fund
I am writing
on behalf of the Bridport Peace & Justice Group.
Thank you for
your letter in response to our concerns about Dorset County Pension Fund
investing in arms companies such as in Halliburton. Thank you too, for
the Pension Fund Annual Report.
In reply to
the points made in your letter, here are our responses.
1. Regarding
your statement that ethical political or sustainability issues must, by
law, be put aside in the management of the funds:
We are not
pressing for Dorset County Pension Fund to disinvest from any shares on
wider ethical, political or sustainability grounds. We are simply pressing
them to disinvest from arms manufacturers.
Moreover you
say that it is a matter of law that ethical, sustainability or political
issues must be set aside when deciding council investment policy. However,
I note that Dumfries & Galloway, the London Boroughs of Harrow, Richmond
upon Thames, and Enfield have managed to steer clear of such investments.
Are you suggesting that they are breaking the law?
2. Regarding
your point that there are practical difficulties, in that large companies
may have some unacceptable parts, while some make generic
parts (eg, nuts and bolts) which could be utilised for unknown purposes:
We are not
pressing for the Dorset County Pension Fund to disinvest from large diversified
businesses, nor from companies that make generic parts that might go on
to be used by others for unknown purposes.
We are simply
asking that the council disinvest from companies that would commonly be
regarded as arms companies. They are easily identified for a list
see http://www.caat.org.uk/campaigns/clean-investment/2007/la-south-west.php.
3. In response
to your point that there is a strong argument that it is more effective
to hold shares in such companies and use voting power to influence outcomes:
Has Dorset
County Pension Fund ever used its voting power to influence an arms company?
My understanding is that General Dynamics are in the business of, amongst
other things, making weapons of mass destruction. Could Dorset County
Pension Fund influence it to diversify into making plough shares by voting
power?
4. You contend
that Selling or not holding stocks has been shown to have little
or no effect. For every seller there is a willing buyer:
The more sellers
there are of shares relative to buyers, the lower the price of the shares
tends to go. The lower the share price, the more difficult it is for these
arms companies to raise money.
5. As regards
your statement that Our work on this topic in the past has shown
that it would be very difficult to fairly operate ethical policies
that all (and not just some) of our stakeholders would sign up to,
we would respond:
When did you
work on this topic in the past? Was the work specifically relating to
arms companies, American Arms Companies, manufacturers of weapons of mass
destruction, or were the terms more vague, such as the term ethical.
When did you
last ask the stakeholders what they would sign up to?
You may recall
that we were told that Iraq was to be invaded, on the strength of what
turned out to be unfounded allegations that they were developing weapons
of mass destruction?
The fact that
the lives of hundreds of thousands of civilians have been sacrificed over
this false claim may have altered the willingness of stakeholders to invest
in arms companies: arms companies that make weapons of mass destruction.
We are resolved
to influence our elected representatives.
Please will
you confirm that the members of the Pension Fund Investment Committee
at the moment, who are representatives from Dorset County Pension Fund,
are elected by the full council? Please can you let me have details of
the current representatives on Please can you let me know when and where
is the next meeting of this committee?
We are suggesting
that the Dorset County Pension Fund disinvests from a total of 13 companies,
out of more than one thousand. Is this really so significant that it will
have any real bearing upon the returns that you receive?
Yours Sincerely
David Partridge
|